According to the dictionary of pseudo-liberals, an independent court means an externally managed court, an independent media means an externally managed media, reads the new statement of the People’s Power.

“Yesterday, a debate was held in the US Senate on the topic of Georgia, where senators distinguished by their friendship with the United National Movement threatened us with the termination of the US funding.

We want to remind the public that the largest part of the US funding is directed to NGOs, which means that this money is not used for our country, but for their own agenda. We think it is a matter of honor not to allow anyone to reproach us for funding their own agenda. Moreover, we believe that the current practice of financing NGOs from abroad creates a natural threat to the sovereignty of Georgia.

A state that is not governed according to the principles of democracy, popular sovereignty and separation of powers is not a full-fledged state. Unfortunately, in the modern world, these concepts have undergone a complete perversion. The clearest example of this is the US, where everyone knows that the constitutionally most powerful person - the President of the US - does not actually rule the state. Besides, no one on the face of the earth can say, instead of the President, who rules the most powerful state in the world. If America’s founding fathers - Washington, Jefferson, Hamilton or Madison - would have seen the current American government, they would probably have suffered from severe depression

The situation is similar in Europe, where the majority of states have essentially lost their sovereignty. In today’s world, democracy means “agentocracy”. According to a widely implemented model, government coalitions are formed in which the majority of parties represent agencies of foreign influence.

We had such a situation in Georgia in 2004-12, when the Government was staffed by an agency managed from outside. All troubles - torture and rape of people, business racket, media monopolization, surrender of territories to Russia, etc. - it happened not only with the tacit support of the regime’s foreign patrons, but directly at their dictation.

Since democracy in the dictionary of pseudo-liberals actually means agentocracy, any process that leads to the replacement of agentocracy with democracy or, conversely, that does not lead democracy to agentocracy, is considered a democratic setback.

That is why the foreign patrons of the UNM are talking about the 2-year democratic setback. Exactly 2 years ago, something happened that they still can’t get used to - Georgian Dream won the elections and didn’t hand over power to the UNM, that is, democracy was not replaced by agentocracy.

The April 19 agreement did not bring about the restoration of the agentocracy.

Also, interestingly, according to the dictionary of pseudo-liberals, the word “independent” is synonymous with “externally controlled”. For example, an independent court means an externally managed court, an independent media means an externally managed media, etc.

According to this model, the courts should be managed by the parties they manage or the NGOs financed by them, and only those media that are managed by agents of foreign influence and serve to establish or strengthen the agentocracy in the state can be referred to as independent”, - reads the statement.