Criminal thinking and the Russian scenario - the members of the civil society are assessing the statements made by members of the parliamentary majority after the first round of the October 28 elections.

Representatives of the non-governmental sector say rhetoric, which the government has been using for the last two days, is dangerous for the country.

According to them, the statements of this content will cause unrest in the country, for which the government will be responsible.

"This is aa appeal, it is intimidation. This is a criminal thinking that the MPs have. If the National Movement wins where is the civil war threat or something?

We can not explain to people what happened in 1992. There was no civil war in 1992. It was a Russian option, it was a legally elected government that was overthrown by the Russian army who had such people who are in the parliament today. One of them is Gedevan Popkhadze, Nukri Kantaria and others. Goga Khaindrava, who participated in this process with weapons has experience, "says the historian, professor of Ilia State University Bejan Javakhia.

According to Giorgi Mshvenieradze, chairman of the NGO "Democratic Initiative", the government has learned from the past years that such statements encourage violence. Mshvenieradze does not exclude that the ruling team is making such messages to escalate violence.

The head of ISFED, Mikheil Benidze calls the government"s statements irresponsible and says that it is unclear what the members of the ruling party indicate when threatening with civil war.