Okruashvili is not an authority whose presented document should undoubtedly be accepted - the majority responded to the agreement between Khalvashi and Okruashvili.

The ruling party assessesd the adoption of Rustavi2 appeal by the Supreme Court .

"There should be no instance where this issue will not be discussed in public and credible decisions will not be taken. The court will have to answer everything and Irakli Okruashvili is not the authority who can be submit any document and it should be accepted without any doubts, "- said Gia Volsky.

As for the consideration without oral hearing, the majority said that it is the prerogative of the court.

According to the opposition, it is important to take into consideration the high public interest. to the court hearing of the case. In their opinion, the Supreme Court should return the Rustavi 2 case to the first instance.

"In fact Kibar Khalvashi has never been a television owner , so it"s natural that the casse should go back to the first instance. However, we see that the Court goes completely the other way, "- says Sergo Ratiani.