The centralized EU structure sometimes imposes strict conditionality that does not necessarily reflect the consensus, said the Chairman of the Georgian Parliament in his speech Conference of Speakers of the European Union in Budapest.

“One example of this practice was the demand from Georgia to establish a system of extraordinary integrity checks for judges, so-called ‘vetting’, conducted by foreign actors.

This system, if accepted, would contradict the very principle of democracy, where authority stems from the people. The entire branch of power would thus become set up by the foreign actors, which goes contrary to the very essence of national sovereignty. I doubt that any of the EU member states would have allowed such an intervention in their sovereignty.

Democracy shall be based on deliberation, not imposition. Consensus ensures that decisions are made collaboratively, respecting the interests and concerns of all member states and partners. This, also, means a Europe where decisions are made not only in centralized unelected bodies, but increasingly closer to the people. In this regard, it is worth giving a more critical examination to the current debate about replacing consensus-based decision-making with a majority principle. In a community of nation-states, small states’ voice should be heard equal to the others, because the truth is not measured by the quantity alone”, - said Shalva Papuashvili.