On March 2, the Supreme Court will hold hearing on Rustavi 2 case and media experts focud on the composition of judges of the focus of in Grand Chamber.

They said that a decision taken behind closed doors on this type of case of high public interest , may be less reliable.

"From the very beginning of this case, the court politicacoloring issue and it was confirmed by all the trials. That"s why I can not help asking questions about why the trial is closed, and the second one is the question that naturally arises - why are the judges whose recusal was demanded in the panel, "- Nino Danelia.

Eastern Partnership Civil Society Forum National Platform member, journalist Lasha Tugushi, when talking focuses on the importance of the decision on the case.He says that Rustavi2 case is a watershed and appeals to judges, not to make a decision, which will be detrimental to the development of the state.

"This process is a watershed of where our state will be . Wheter we will reach the shore, where the country"s democratic development is taking place, or on the shore, where the country"s construction is not underway. Therefore, I would like to call on the court not to take a decision that would be harmful to the general development of the country, "- said Lasha Tugushi.